Multi Criteria Decision Making pada Strategi Pengolahan Sampah Padat Perkotaan

  • Yosef Adicita Universal University
  • Muhammad Rizki Apritama Program Studi Teknik Lingkungan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Universal Batam
  • Anshah Silmi Afifah Program Studi Teknik Lingkungan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Universal Batam
PDF
DOI https://doi.org/10.31544/jtera.v5.i2.2020.191-200
Published 2020-12-26
Full Text Preview
Download PDF

Abstract

Penyebab ketidakefektifan sistem pengolahan sampah perkotaan adalah kurangnya pemahaman dan kedisplinan dalam teknik pengolahan yang sesuai dengan jenis timbulan sampah yang dihasilkan setiap harinya dan peningkatan populasi yang berbanding lurus dengan peningkatan aktivitas dan timbulan limbah padat yang dihasilkan. Permasalahan ini sering ditemukan di daerah perkotaan di Indonesia dan salah satunya adalah Kota Batam. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan teknik pengolahan yang paling ideal untuk sampah padat yang dihasilkan penduduk di Kota Batam dengan merumuskan lima skenario teknik pengolahan sampah menggunakan Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), dan Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Kelompok kriteria yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknologi, lingkungan, ekonomi, dan sosial dengan jumlah total kriteria adalah 28 kriteria. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, skenario pengolahan sampah paling ideal untuk Kota Batam adalah pengolahan dengan cara 50% sanitary landfill dan 50% insenerasi yang diperoleh dari PROMETHEE, 100% sanitary landfill diperoleh dari TOPSIS.

Keywords

pengolahan sampah MCDM PROMETHEE TOPSIS

References

E. Damanhuri, “Some principal issues on municipal solid waste management in Indonesia,†in Expert Meeting on Waste Management …, 2005, pp. 1–10.
A. Allesch and P. H. Brunner, “Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review,†Waste Manag. Res., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 461–73.
S. Das, S. H. Lee, P. Kumar, K. H. Kim, S. S. Lee, and S. S. Bhattacharya, “Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability,†J. Clean. Prod., vol. 228, pp. 658–678, 2019.
L. M. Goulart Coelho, L. C. Lange, and H. M. G. Coelho, “Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods,†Waste Management and Research. pp. 1–26, 2017.
A. Coban, I. F. Ertis, and N. A. Cavdaroglu, “Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey,†J. Clean. Prod., vol. 180, pp. 1–33, 2018.
A. Makan, D. Malamis, O. Assobhei, M. Loizidou, and M. Mountadar, “Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for the treatment of municipal solid waste in Morocco,†Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 300–317, 2013.
S. Jovanovic, S. Savic, N. Jovicic, G. Boskovic, and Z. Djordjevic, “Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management,†Waste Manag. Res., pp. 1–12, 2016.
D. Czajczyńska et al., “Potential of pyrolysis processes in the waste management sector,†Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 3, pp. 171–197, 2017.
K. Rousis, K. Moustakas, S. Malamis, A. Papadopoulos, and M. Loizidou, “Multi-criteria analysis for the determination of the best WEEE management scenario in Cyprus,†Waste Manag., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1941–1954, 2008.
E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S. N. Sanchez, and T. Ray, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making : An Operations Research Approach,†Electronics, vol. 15, pp. 175–186, 1998.
J. P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method,†Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228–238, 1986.
E. Arıkan, Z. T. Şimşit-Kalender, and Ö. Vayvay, “Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey,†J. Clean. Prod., vol. 142, pp. 403–412, 2017.
C. Zurbrügg, M. Gfrerer, H. Ashadi, W. Brenner, and D. Küper, “Determinants of sustainability in solid waste management - The Gianyar Waste Recovery Project in Indonesia,†Waste Manag., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2126–2133, 2012.
M. EkmekçioÄlu, T. Kaya, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste,†Waste Management, vol. 30, no. 8–9. pp. 1729–1736, 2010.
S. Khan and M. N. Faisal, “An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options,†Waste Manag., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1500–1508, 2008.
J. P. Su, M. L. Hung, C. W. Chao, and H. W. Ma, “Applying multi-criteria decision-making to improve the waste reduction policy in Taiwan,†Waste Manag. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2010.
R. Ewa, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models By Applying the Topsis Method To Crisp and Interval Data,†Mult. Criteria Decis. Making/University Econ. Katowice, vol. 6, pp. 200–230, 2011.
A. Soltani, K. Hewage, B. Reza, and R. Sadiq, “Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: A review,†Waste Manag., vol. 35, pp. 318–328, 2015.
M. Behzadian, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,†Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 198–215, 2010.
K. Miettinen, J. Hakanen, and D. Podkopaev, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. 2016.
C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Lecture Notes in Econmoics and Mathematical Systems. 1981.
F. V. Carstensen, M. Graziano, N. Vorotytseva, W. E. Waite, and K. E. Parr, “Economic Analysis of Bioenergy: An Integrated Multidisciplinary Approach,†in School of Business, University of Connecticut, Elsevier B.V., 2013.
A. Sharma and S. K. Kar, Energy Sustainability Through Green Energy. 2015.
A. Pivato, S. Masi, D. De Caprio, and A. Tommasin, “Sanitary landfill costs from design to aftercare: Criteria for defining unit cost,†Detritus, vol. 4, pp. 140–156, 2018.
H. Jouhara et al., “Municipal waste management systems for domestic use,†Energy, vol. 139, pp. 485–506, 2017.
G. E. Louis, L. M. Magpili, and C. A. Pinto, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making and composting of waste in the municipality of Bacoor in the Philippines,†Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag., vol. 7, no. 3–4, pp. 351–368, 2007.
C. A. Salman, S. Schwede, M. Naqvi, E. Thorin, and J. Yan, “Synergistic combination of pyrolysis, anaerobic digestion, and CHP plants.,†Energy Procedia, vol. 158, pp. 1323–1329, 2019.
G. Oliveira Neto, L. Chaves, L. Pinto, J. Santana, M. Amorim, and M. Rodrigues, “Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits of Adoption of Pyrolysis Process of Tires: A Feasible and Ecofriendly Mode to Reduce the Impacts of Scrap Tires in Brazil,†Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1–18, 2019.
D. Wu, A. Zhang, L. Xiao, Y. Ba, H. Ren, and L. Liu, “Pyrolysis Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste in Oxygen-free Circumstance,†Energy Procedia, vol. 105, pp. 1255–1262, 2017.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2: December 2020

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The copyright to this article is transferred to JTERA if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to JTERA. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. The copyright transfer form will be sent via email before the article published.

The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.

How to Cite

[1]
“Multi Criteria Decision Making pada Strategi Pengolahan Sampah Padat Perkotaan”, JTERA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 191–200, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.31544/jtera.v5.i2.2020.191-200.