Open Journal Systems

Multi Criteria Decision Making pada Strategi Pengolahan Sampah Padat Perkotaan

       Yosef Adicita, Muhammad Rizki Apritama, Anshah Silmi Afifah


Penyebab ketidakefektifan sistem pengolahan sampah perkotaan adalah kurangnya pemahaman dan kedisplinan dalam teknik pengolahan yang sesuai dengan jenis timbulan sampah yang dihasilkan setiap harinya dan peningkatan populasi yang berbanding lurus dengan peningkatan aktivitas dan timbulan limbah padat yang dihasilkan. Permasalahan ini sering ditemukan di daerah perkotaan di Indonesia dan salah satunya adalah Kota Batam. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan teknik pengolahan yang paling ideal untuk sampah padat yang dihasilkan penduduk di Kota Batam dengan merumuskan lima skenario teknik pengolahan sampah menggunakan Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), dan Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Kelompok kriteria yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknologi, lingkungan, ekonomi, dan sosial dengan jumlah total kriteria adalah 28 kriteria. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, skenario pengolahan sampah paling ideal untuk Kota Batam adalah pengolahan dengan cara 50% sanitary landfill dan 50% insenerasi yang diperoleh dari PROMETHEE, 100% sanitary landfill diperoleh dari TOPSIS.


pengolahan sampah; MCDM; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS

Full Text:



E. Damanhuri, “Some principal issues on municipal solid waste management in Indonesia,” in Expert Meeting on Waste Management …, 2005, pp. 1–10.

A. Allesch and P. H. Brunner, “Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 461–73.

S. Das, S. H. Lee, P. Kumar, K. H. Kim, S. S. Lee, and S. S. Bhattacharya, “Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 228, pp. 658–678, 2019.

L. M. Goulart Coelho, L. C. Lange, and H. M. G. Coelho, “Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods,” Waste Management and Research. pp. 1–26, 2017.

A. Coban, I. F. Ertis, and N. A. Cavdaroglu, “Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 180, pp. 1–33, 2018.

A. Makan, D. Malamis, O. Assobhei, M. Loizidou, and M. Mountadar, “Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for the treatment of municipal solid waste in Morocco,” Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 300–317, 2013.

S. Jovanovic, S. Savic, N. Jovicic, G. Boskovic, and Z. Djordjevic, “Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management,” Waste Manag. Res., pp. 1–12, 2016.

D. Czajczyńska et al., “Potential of pyrolysis processes in the waste management sector,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 3, pp. 171–197, 2017.

K. Rousis, K. Moustakas, S. Malamis, A. Papadopoulos, and M. Loizidou, “Multi-criteria analysis for the determination of the best WEEE management scenario in Cyprus,” Waste Manag., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1941–1954, 2008.

E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S. N. Sanchez, and T. Ray, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making : An Operations Research Approach,” Electronics, vol. 15, pp. 175–186, 1998.

J. P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 228–238, 1986.

E. Arıkan, Z. T. Şimşit-Kalender, and Ö. Vayvay, “Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 142, pp. 403–412, 2017.

C. Zurbrügg, M. Gfrerer, H. Ashadi, W. Brenner, and D. Küper, “Determinants of sustainability in solid waste management - The Gianyar Waste Recovery Project in Indonesia,” Waste Manag., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2126–2133, 2012.

M. Ekmekçioĝlu, T. Kaya, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste,” Waste Management, vol. 30, no. 8–9. pp. 1729–1736, 2010.

S. Khan and M. N. Faisal, “An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options,” Waste Manag., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1500–1508, 2008.

J. P. Su, M. L. Hung, C. W. Chao, and H. W. Ma, “Applying multi-criteria decision-making to improve the waste reduction policy in Taiwan,” Waste Manag. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2010.

R. Ewa, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models By Applying the Topsis Method To Crisp and Interval Data,” Mult. Criteria Decis. Making/University Econ. Katowice, vol. 6, pp. 200–230, 2011.

A. Soltani, K. Hewage, B. Reza, and R. Sadiq, “Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: A review,” Waste Manag., vol. 35, pp. 318–328, 2015.

M. Behzadian, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 198–215, 2010.

K. Miettinen, J. Hakanen, and D. Podkopaev, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. 2016.

C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Lecture Notes in Econmoics and Mathematical Systems. 1981.

F. V. Carstensen, M. Graziano, N. Vorotytseva, W. E. Waite, and K. E. Parr, “Economic Analysis of Bioenergy: An Integrated Multidisciplinary Approach,” in School of Business, University of Connecticut, Elsevier B.V., 2013.

A. Sharma and S. K. Kar, Energy Sustainability Through Green Energy. 2015.

A. Pivato, S. Masi, D. De Caprio, and A. Tommasin, “Sanitary landfill costs from design to aftercare: Criteria for defining unit cost,” Detritus, vol. 4, pp. 140–156, 2018.

H. Jouhara et al., “Municipal waste management systems for domestic use,” Energy, vol. 139, pp. 485–506, 2017.

G. E. Louis, L. M. Magpili, and C. A. Pinto, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making and composting of waste in the municipality of Bacoor in the Philippines,” Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag., vol. 7, no. 3–4, pp. 351–368, 2007.

C. A. Salman, S. Schwede, M. Naqvi, E. Thorin, and J. Yan, “Synergistic combination of pyrolysis, anaerobic digestion, and CHP plants.,” Energy Procedia, vol. 158, pp. 1323–1329, 2019.

G. Oliveira Neto, L. Chaves, L. Pinto, J. Santana, M. Amorim, and M. Rodrigues, “Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits of Adoption of Pyrolysis Process of Tires: A Feasible and Ecofriendly Mode to Reduce the Impacts of Scrap Tires in Brazil,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1–18, 2019.

D. Wu, A. Zhang, L. Xiao, Y. Ba, H. Ren, and L. Liu, “Pyrolysis Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste in Oxygen-free Circumstance,” Energy Procedia, vol. 105, pp. 1255–1262, 2017.

Abstract 239 View    PDF viewed = 140 View


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 JTERA (Jurnal Teknologi Rekayasa)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright @2016-2021 JTERA (Jurnal Teknologi Rekayasa) p-ISSN 2548-737X e-ISSN 2548-8678.

     Lisensi Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JTERA Editorial Office:
Politeknik Sukabumi
Jl. Babakan Sirna 25, Sukabumi 43132, West Java, Indonesia
Phone/Fax: +62 266215417
Whatsapp: +62 81809214709